They don't always need to be absolutely even. The first game had less options for lesbians and gay men, and i totally get if an option you don't like isn't available, but this writer seems really really helpful, and at this time is asking for more work for free, since she offered once. It just seems a bit sad when everyone has at least 2 options of their chosen gender. Its okay for a game to have extra romances occaisonally.P_Tigras wrote:jack1974 wrote:Actually yes with an extra BxB, every character would have the same amount romances. In the base game there are two homosex and two straight romances for each. So that's even. Then in the DLC currently we have:P_Tigras wrote: That wouldn't address BxG however. So things still wouldn't be balanced.
Alex: BxB Christophe, BxG Lola
Diana: GxB Kaden, GxG Lola, GxG Galina
adding Alex+Kaden would add another BxB to Alex, so it would be even. Yes, there would be more homosex romances than straight ones (so it's not like BxG, even people wanting GxB could complain), but at least each character would have same amount
Personally? I am really happy if a game has 2 options because it feels like choice then. But I have bought and enjoyed games of Jacks with only one option, even if it may be my least favorite one, because hey it was available! I mean this seems to be a creep up or a competition, which I don't think is the best. I totally understand having a favorite or feeling like you don't like the options, but i mean thats okay once and awhile, Yeah?
I mean BxG has an extra CG, does that mean even if they added 2 new romances GxB and BxG, would they have to make every possible sexuality another CG to make it even? Its not a competition, sometimes one group or another will have extra options or features, especially if stuff happens during development. But it seems like the thing the writer may take away is she can't offer to do anything for free, since then people will ask for more.