I am not 100% sure, but it sure looks like it's polish. I have no idea what it says, though...



Anyway, possibly it will become necessary that only registered users may edit the wiki.

Yeah it looks like Polish, and google translate agrees. That first one looks like some sort of soup recipe. Strange...

There were two more such pages with links in them. I removed the links - and I had to keep myself very much from deleting the pages altogether. Maybe it is better to do this, unfortunately I would not know how the topic can be removed (rather than just the text.)



However, it seems as if the pages can only be found by direct link or "recent changes".

http://aravorn.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ile_podjada_bycie_w_niesympatycznych_periodach_i_umiej%C4%99tno%C5%9B%C4%87%3F

http://aravorn.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Dok%C4%85d_na_ferie_do_Hiszpanii%3F



Edit: I just looked up the IP number ‎37.59.29.59 used in the creation: It maps to a DNS entry, but the resulting domain is just a godaddy.com placeholder page. Strange... but I never needed to care about spammers very much.

Sigh that's what I feared... every time you use opensource stuff, there are spammers. I blocked that user, but indeed I should look how to prevent anonymous user to post!!

OK I have now disabled completely registrations, is the safest way. If anyone wants to edit/create pages will need to ask me to create an account. Is the best solution

Ehm ... sorry, but I cannot edit any more. Not even when I am logged in.

Yeah, I can no longer edit as well, and I am logged in as well.



If it's not an imposition, I would like to be able to edit again. If it's not to be, I can understand that as well.

Haha sorry I forgot to add you to the "Trusted Users" group doing it now!

Let me know if you can edit again now, I think should be fine?

Haha sorry I forgot to add you to the "Trusted Users" group doing it now!

Let me know if you can edit again now, I think should be fine?

Thank you, I can edit again!



And I figured it was just a matter of permissions, etc. Much easier to forbid everyone and then add them later

Yes, I can confirm I can now edit again. Thanks for the fast response.

Good, hopefully this will solve the spam problem

Minor question, but are nymphs and sylphs the same race in Loren? If you go Draco's route in Horus, going to the elf lands, Loren spends a night of pleasure with nymphs. If you undergo Rei's personal quest, you encounter sylphs. Both use the same picture.

Hmm should ask Aleema but I think was more because didn't had time to do a different image

Hmm should ask Aleema but I think was more because didn't had time to do a different image

I certainly can understand reusing an image



I made a separate entry for that just in case.



If possible, can this entry be deleted?



http://aravorn.com/index.php?title=Desert_Town



I didn't mean to name it that. I made a new entry called Dark Elves Village (to match the one on the map), and just copied/pasted it. I couldn't figure out how to change the name of the entry itself.

Deleted it

Thanks for the deletion.



I'm hoping to get a few things added to the wiki today. At the moment, I have Thieves and Warriors under the Art of War (since the way both are treated, each is viewed through the lens of battle). Magic classes will be in the magic category. However, things can certainly be split up into different sections.



I've also added some material to the NPCs in Loren. Some of it is spoilerish, but hope that is alright. I figured if you allowed Grob's demise to be mentioned, then other details aren't any more spoilerific.

Yes, I don't know if there's a plugin to allow spoilers in wikimedia, going to check! (something similar to what we have here in forums, so by default the spoiler content is hidden and people have to click to see it).

Yes, I don't know if there's a plugin to allow spoilers in wikimedia, going to check! (something similar to what we have here in forums, so by default the spoiler content is hidden and people have to click to see it).

If there is one, it would be a good idea.



Obviously, there are ways around spoilers. For example, something I intend to update on the Triberg entry is the name of the ruling family. The name itself isn't a spoiler, but how one finds it (say romancing a certain someone in Spirited Heart) would be.



Anyways, sorry to take you away from what you are working on

No problems, I like the wiki, is useful even to me when planning the next games so is not wasted time

I found a spoiler extension, works the same as the one in forums, you use the tag <spoiler>spoiler_text</spoiler>

I tested it on Ryzom entry and seems to work fine !

edit: aww no, it breaks the internal links well at this point not sure if is really useful. If you use it only for blocks of text without link, is OK, otherwise...

Yeah, that is a bit problematic. Definitely covers material, but it makes a mess with all the brackets (internal links).



However, I can go back and use the spoiler tag if you wish, and remove the internal links.